[Pgcluster-general] pgCluster Status
Jumping
quzhengping at gmail.com
Wed Apr 22 05:10:41 UTC 2009
Hi, Mitani
You back, it's a good new.
Best Regards,
Jumping Qu
------
Don't tell me how many enemies we have, but where they are!
(ADV:Perl -- It's like Java, only it lets you deliver on time and under
budget.)
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:14 PM, <mitani at sraw.co.jp> wrote:
> Hi Joshua,
>
> I'm glad to get your kindly e-mail.
> I would like to appologize to not updating PGCluster site for a year.
> I upset my health caused by hard work after I moved to Japan from the
> Netherlands.
>
> However, I have not give up PGCluster Project.
>
> Currentry, I'm planing to develop the three type of new version.
> (1) Current version with install support / Administration tool.
> (2) DB Cluster with data shared model
> (3) DB Grid on individual memory model
>
> I'd like to release the (1) version as soon as possible.
> Then I'm stucking in the (2).
> 2 years ago, I made full shared distributed memory, semaphore and storage
> system.
> However, performance point of view, it was not do any good.
>
> Still I'm seeking the best way in order to improve the performance.
>
> A few month ago, I talked with professor at University about it.
> He said a simply. "There is no answer."
> I know about that, but I don't believe it.
>
> I've begun to create new test environment for the partial shared data model
> from last week.
> That is my latest hope.
>
> The (3) is a just idea.
> I've continued trial and error test of (2).
> In the bathroom, I got an inspiration after a terrible failures.
>
> I'd like to implement this idea.
>
> Anyway, I'll release the latest one in the near future.
>
> Regards,
>
> At.Mitani
>
>
> -- original message --
> From: Joshua Schmidlkofer<joshland at gmail.com>
> To: <pgcluster-general at pgfoundry.org>
> Sent: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:40:48 -0700
> Subject: [Pgcluster-general] pgCluster Status
>
> >Howdy,
> >
> > Is this project alive? It looks like people lost interest. Is it
> >simply that awesome that no further work must be done? Did it get
> >taken into the main branch of PGSQL? I find the prospect of geniune
> >multi-master replication awesome, and was excited about finding this,
> >but now it looks like it's no longer living.
> >
> >Sincerely,
> > Joshua
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pgcluster-general mailing list
> Pgcluster-general at pgfoundry.org
> http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgcluster-general
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pgcluster-general/attachments/20090422/14a008b3/attachment.html
More information about the Pgcluster-general
mailing list